addendum to 2 previous articles on swine flu
Dr Tim O'Shea
Author of The Sanctity of Human Blood 13th ed.
Although the H1N1 panic is at a fever pitch at this time, it's a safe bet
that by summer 2010 the swine flu issue will have faded off into the
boneyard of vaccine memorabilia.
Remember you read that here.
Policymakers have well discerned that this particular illusion has a finite
shelf life, due in no small part to the ever-shortening attention span of
the collective American mentality.
We must recall that the commotion in recent years over smallpox, anthrax,
SARS, and Avian flu lasted only as long as necessary for the drug and
vaccine funds to be allocated. Once that happens, there is no longer any
motive to continue to fan the flames of pandemic hysteria - a media campaign
like that requires so much effort, and costs so much money to maintain,
especially for a disease that never existed in the first place.
The template for this type of disease diversion is now firmly established -
so why tamper with a working model? Our textbook refers to the abrupt media
blackout which routinely signals the end of the line for these creations -
we call it The Case of the Disappearing Threat. Once it becomes evident
that the vaccine and the drugs assigned to the current pandemic du jour,
that these are dangerous and completely ineffective, the global threat
itself, which has been hawked incessantly for months and months as the
disease threat may bring the human race to extinction - is suddenly gone.
Poof. Like it never existed. Just like.
And no one ever asks where it went, or thinks it odd that something
presented so urgently suddenly vanished. And then magically no more cases
of the horrible global killer are ever heard of again - not even one. This
is precisely what took place not only with smallpox, anthrax, SARS, and
avian flu phantasms of recent years, but with the 1976 swine flu vaccine
disaster as well. Remember? One might be grateful for the good manners of
these individual pathogens who were gracious enough to simply disappear just
because we were unable to come up with any drugs of vaccines that actually
worked. Such politeness.
Anyone paying even moderate attention to the parade of emergencies that
have been making their appearance lately with almost routine regularity,
might begin to be desensitized to the urgency of these situations, vaguely
remembering that since they survived the last one, well they'll probably
survive this one as well. The slightly more vigilant might begin to notice
that most of the programs result in a viable vaccine being developed, and
thereby the threat to themselves and their families will eventually be
LICENSED AND UNTESTED
This is exactly wherein lies the clear and present danger of the current
swine flu vaccine program. This swine flu vaccine is actually being brought
into existence for dissemination among the general public, starting with
children. With 5 manufacturers having begun clinical trials only in August
2009, none scheduled for completion until next April, it is an astounding
lesson in vaccine politics that the FDA approved the untested H1N1 vaccine
on 15 Sep 09, just one month after the testing began!
[ www.sanofipasteur.com ] Licensed and untested.
We see precisely the same sequence of events that led to the last swine flu
fiasco in 1976 - 50 million were vaccinated with that untested vaccine. 21
deaths 565 paralyzed, withdrawn in 10 weeks. And never replaced. Never
replaced - that's the point. Why not? If the threat was so urgent that we
had to start vaccinating before the vaccine was even tested, then where did
that threat go? Why didn't we just withdraw the toxic vaccine and then
continue with researching and testing to develop one that worked?
CHANGE THE DEFAULT
With just a little research, independent of the popular media, a cognition
begins to take shape in the mind of the discriminating reader, that there
may be an ulterior agenda here, one that is not necessarily directed toward
the overall well-being of children. If such a reader is a responsible
parent, the next realization might be to change the default setting with
respect to the decision to vaccinate. At present most parents default in
favor of - when in doubt, vaccinate.
Many today are changing that default setting: no more vaccines until it is
proven to me beyond a doubt that
- the vaccines have been tested and found to be 100% safe with
no chance of harming the child
- that the child absolutely needs the vaccine for optimum immune
- there are no economic or political agendas involved in the
vaccine being recommended
Change the default. It is becoming increasingly clear that natural selection
will favor the lines of those parents who take these extra precautions to
protect and safeguard the inner immunity of their children.
Who else is going to come forward?
The FDA, who does no testing of their own before making a decision, but
relies entirely on the research submitted to them from the companies who
stand to make billions in profits if the vaccine is approved?
The vaccine manufacturers, who have been granted 100% immunity from
liability for any deaths or injuries? The other regulatory agencies - NIH,
CDC, HHS - whose political connections to the vaccine companies are a matter
of public record?
But that's exactly what all the hurry, all the hyperbole, all the outright
misdirection is about. They know that they don't have time to come up with
a fully tested vaccine - that would take a year. But by that time the
imaginary disease will be gone, with no hope of raising it from the dead.
The market is here and now. And everyone - the clinics, the manufacturers,
the regulators, and the media - all want their share of the rewards.