by Alan G. Phillips, J.D.
I’m deeply concerned about the upcoming distribution of seasonal flu shots through public schools in North Carolina (and elsewhere), and you should be, too—for several important reasons.
First, a number of studies reveal that flu shots provides little if any protection to people of any age, perhaps due in part to the fact that vaccine manufacturers have to guess which flu strain will be dominant months in advance—and they often guess wrong. Children with asthma who get the flu shot are actually at a greater risk for hospitalization than those who do not get the vaccine.[i] A review of more than 51 studies involving more than 294,000 children it was found there was "no evidence that injecting children 6-24 months of age with a flu shot was any more effective than placebo.”[ii] Similar results have been found in studies for adults and the elderly.[iii] Recent Canadian data submitted for publishing shows that the seasonal flu shot doubles the odds of contracting the H1N1 ”swine” flu.[iv] Tom Jefferson, a Cochrane Collaboration epidemiologist who “knows the flu vaccine literature better than anyone else on the planet,” says the vast majority of flu studies favoring seasonal flu vaccines were deeply flawed. He stated: “Rubbish is not a scientific term, but I think it’s the term that applies.”[v] A majority of health care professionals don’t get annual seasonal flu shots[vi], and a majority also object to getting this year’s seasonal and H1N1 flu shots[vii]; what do they know that the rest of us don’t? In New York, where seasonal and swine flu shots were mandated under the state health department’s recently declared “emergency,” the response was a series of health care employee protest rallies around the state and court cases that resulted in a Temporary Restraining Order from the NY State Supreme Court, preventing enforcement of the mandate.[viii]
Next, the distribution of seasonal flu shots through public schools amounts to a questionable State endorsement of one of several different modalities. The North Carolina Supreme Court has stated, “To limit progress by establishing allopathy as the state system of healing, and forbidding all Others . . . would be as foreign to our system as a state church for the cure of souls.”[ix] Yet, this is precisely what the State has now done, and not for lack of proven alternatives. Last fall, Cuba carried out a successful use of homeoprophylaxis on a population of 2.5 million Cubans in their annual Leptospirosis epidemic; the results substantially exceeded those obtained previously with conventional vaccinations at a fraction of the cost,[x] and with none of the deaths and permanent disabilities we routinely tolerate with vaccines. Studies also show that Vitamin D is protective against the flu.[xi] So why aren’t schools providing these more cost-effective and successful means of preventing the flu—and others also proven effective against the flu such as chiropractic[xii] and acupuncture?[xiii] The answer seems obvious: These other protections aren’t profitable for the pharmaceutical industry. This assertion is not mere cynicism. Conflicts of interest abound—members of the FDA and CDC committees who license and recommend vaccines often have ties to vaccine manufacturers.[xiv]
Finally, “free” vaccines in public schools are anything but free. We the taxpayers pay for them, and at a far greater cost than the price of the vaccines themselves—we also pay for their unintended but sometimes devastating consequences. The federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out nearly two billion dollars in taxpayer money since 1986 for deaths and injuries caused by vaccines in the United States,[xv] and this may represent only a drop in the bucket. The vast majority of vaccine injuries are not reported,[xvi] and few of the reported cases result in compensation due to the strict requirements. The result? Private vaccine manufacturers have more than the usual business profits with a captive market, but none of the usual business liability—we pay for both.
Few doubt that State educators have the best of intentions for our children, but they have seriously missed the boat on this one. Government should not be in the health care business, but if it is going to be, its policy and practice should be driven by facts—by what actually works—and not by any one industry’s clout and propaganda. Better yet, health care is a personal matter that should be decided one person at a time, privately, between each person or parent and the health care provider of their choice. As wonderful as our educational institutions may be, it is not appropriate for them to promote—let alone distribute and administer—any one industry’s healthcare products to our children.
Flu vaccines should NOT be distributed through the schools.
Alan G. Phillips, J.D.
P.O. Box 3473
Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473
919-960-5172
[i] The American Thoracic Society’s 105th International Conference, May 15-20, 2009, San Diego.
[ii] The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2008).
[iv] MOH cautious on flu shot fears, http://www.healthzone.ca/health/newsfeatures/article/700026
[v] Does the Vaccine Matter?, http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200911/brownlee-h1n1/2
[vi] Many health workers refuse flu shots, http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Entertainment/Many+health+workers+refuse+shots/1997673/story.html; Health Care Workers Need Flu Shots, Too, But Not All Are Getting Them, http://www.cdh.org/News.aspx?id=121262
[vii] E.g., 65% of French Nurses Will Refuse Swine Flu Vaccine Over Safety Concerns, http://blogs.healthfreedomalliance.org/blog/2009/09/24/65-of-french-nurses-will-refuse-swine-flu-vaccine-over-safety-concerns/; Half of Healthcare Workers Will Likely Refuse H1N1 Vaccine, Research Finds, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,542950,00.html
[viii] Judge Halts Mandatory Flu Vaccines for Health Care Workers,
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/judge-halts-mandatory-flu-vaccines-for-health-care-workers/?hp
[ix] State v. McKnight, 131 N.C. 717, 42 S.E. 580,
[x] Successful Use of Homeopathy In Over 2.5 Million People Reported From Cuba,
http://homeopathyresource.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/successful-use-of-homeopathy-in-over-5-million-people-reported-from-cuba/
[xi] See, e.g., Researchers see link between vitamin D, flu immunity, http://www.jsonline.com/features/health/44680902.html; Vitamin D deficiency linked to more colds and flu, http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=vitamin-d-deficiency-linked-to-more-2009-02-23; etc.
[xii] Flu season wellness plan should include chiropractic care, http://www.worldchiropracticalliance.org/media/fluseason.htm
[xiii] What Can TCM Do For You During The Flu Season?, http://www.acupuncture.com/conditions/flu.htm
[xiv] Congressional report reveals FDA "conflict of interest",
http://www.americanchiropractic.net/FDA/Congressional%20report%20reveals%20FDA.pdf
[xv] National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/
[xvi] Statement of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), Hearing of the House subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, “Compensating Vaccine Injuries: Are Reforms Needed?” September 28, 1999. Less than 1% according to Barbara Fisher, citing former FDA commissioner David Kessler, 1993, JAMA, in the Statement of the NVIC. Less than 10%, accordingly to K.M. Severyn, R.Ph., Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, May 28, 1993.
I couldn't agree with you more. I can't see Homeoprophylaxis ever being used by the US. They would simply not make enough money from it. Nor could they use their fear mongering skills they seem to love so much. They're making it more difficult every year using this method (homeoprophylaxis) with my child getting into school. Even though he is the healthiest one there!
Posted by: DD | October 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM
A homeopath local to me now offers influenzinum, a remedy that can be
taken phrophylactically to prevent flu and swine flu. There's no need to
risk harm from the vaccines. Hmmm...maybe it will also protect against
swine flu one could cotract from others who have gotten the intranasal
live virus vaccine.On Tue, October 27, 2009 2:15 pm,
typepad@sixapart.com wrote: NEW! More options for replying to
comments via email: - To reply privately to the commenter,
click on the commenter's email address below. - To
reply publicly on your blog, reply to this email.
A new comment from DD was received on the post
Attorney Questions School-Administered Flu Shots of
the blog BlogVax. If you would like to post a reply
to this comment you can do so at the following URL:
http://blog.novaccine.com/blogvax/2009/10/attorney-questions-schooladministered-flu-shots.html?cid=6a00d834208ef453ef0120a625601c970b#comment-6a00d834208ef453ef0120a625601c970b
Comment: -------- I
couldn't agree with you more. I can't see Homeoprophylaxis ever being used by the US. They would simply not make enough money from it.
Nor could they use their fear mongering skills they seem to
love so much. They're making it more difficult every year using
this method (homeoprophylaxis) with my child getting into
school. Even though he is the healthiest one there!
Commenter name: DD Commenter email:
holistichealingjourneys@gmail.com IP address: 98.235.175.219
Authentication: None Comment
Actions: ---------------- Unpublish this
comment: Delete this comment: Mark this comment as spam: Edit this comment: Enjoy! The TypePad Team
P.S.: Learn more about replying to comments:
http://help.sixapart.com/tp/us/replying_to_comments.html -- Alan G. Phillips, J.D. Attorney
and Counselor at Law P.O. Box 3473 Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473
919-960-5172 www.vaccinerights.com
Posted by: Alan G. Phillips, Esq. | October 27, 2009 at 06:27 PM